Can Orchestration Teaching be improved?

Анна Александровна Мельникова

doi:10.21638/spbu15.2023.401

Авторы

Анна Александровна Мельникова Real Conservatorio Superior de Música “Victoria Eugenia” de Granada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2023.401

Аннотация

The fundamentals of mastering orchestration are a well-grounded knowledge of the instruments, their mechanics, techniques, and their phenomenology. To succeed in instrumentation and orchestration praxis, students must commonly 1) massively memorize examples of successful orchestration available in treatises on orchestration; 2) analyze as many as possible orchestral scores, and 3) orchestrate excerpts proposed by their instrumentation teachers. We aimed to conduct an exploratory study to detect possible voids in orchestration teaching. For this purpose we recruited 16 participants for this aim. Eight were Music Pedagogy students in their senior academic year, and the other eight were Composition undergraduates. The participants of the Pedagogy group completed one course in instrumentology, while the composers-students had a background of at least one course in instrumentation. Due to the differences in training, Pedagogy students instrumented an excerpt from a song by Ibert, and Composition students orchestrated an excerpt transcribed for piano from “Romeo and Juliet” (overture-fantasia) composed by Tchaikovsky. Also, we asked the participants to write down all their decisions and choice-making during the task to obtain more information for a deeper insight. As a result, we observed that the participants of both groups showed poor performance and low-quality products, except for those who conducted large ensembles. Both groups presented relevant similarities concerning orchestration-related concepts and procedures. Therefore, we can conclude that the general trend of the handbooks on instrumentation and orchestration is to work from a prescriptive model. We attribute the low-quality results of the composers’ group (comparable to non-composers) to the quantity of information to be integrated into the frame of such a model. Rimsky-Korsakov inaugurated the transition to a nomothetic model concerning the tembrotechnonic musical structure. But still, major understanding must be achieved regarding the timbre.

Ключевые слова:

general rules, instrumentology, instrumentation, orchestration, pedagogy, Gestalt, musical analysis, prescriptive model, nomothetic model, polytimbral texture

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.

Библиографические ссылки

References

1. Rimsky-Korsakov, Nikolay. Chronicle of My Musical Life. Ed. by Nadezhda Rimskaia-Korsakova. St Petersburg: Tipografiia Glazunova Publ., 1909. (In Russian)

2. Reymore, Lindsey. “Characterizing Prototypical Musical Instrument Timbres with Timbre Trait Profiles”. Musicae Scientiae, vol. 3, iss. 3 (2022): 648–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649211001523

3. Reymore, Lindsey, and David Huron. “Using Auditory Imagery Tasks to Map the Cognitive Linguistic Dimensions of Musical Instrument Timbre Qualia”. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain 30, no. 3 (2020): 124–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000263

4. Carpentier, Grégoire, Gérard Assayag, and Emmanuel Saint-James. “Solving the Musical Orchestration Problem Using Multiobjective Constrained Optimization with a Genetic Local Search Approach”. Journal of Heuristics 16, no. 5 (2010): 681–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-009-9113-7

5. Chon, Song Hui, David Huron, and Dana DeVlieger. “An Exploratory Study of Western Orchestration: Patterns through History”. Empirical Musicology Review 12, no. 3/4 (2017): 116–59.

6. Reuter, Christoph. “Commentary on ‘An Exploratory Study of Western Orchestration: Patterns through History’ by S. H. Chon, D. Huron, & D. DeVlieger”. Empirical Musicology Review 12, 3/4 (2018): 160–72. https://doi.org/10.18061/EMR.V12I3-4.5992

7. Fischer, Manda, and others. “Instrument Timbre Enhances Perceptual Segregation In Orchestral Music”. Music Perception 38, no. 5 (2021): 473–98. https://doi.org/10.1525/MP.2021.38.5.473

8. McAdams, Stephen. “Timbre as a Structuring Force in Music”. In Timbre: Acoustics, Perception, and Cognition, ed. by Kai Siedenburg and others, 211–43. Springer Cham, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14832-4_8

9. Goodchild, Meghan, Jonathan Wild, and Stephen McAdams. “Exploring Emotional Responses to Orchestral Gestures”. Musicae Scientiae 23, no. 1 (2019): 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864917704033

10. Lembke, Sven-Amin, Scott Levine, and Stephen McAdams. “Blending Between Bassoon and Horn Players: An Analysis of Timbral Adjustments During Musical Performance”. Music Perception 35, no. 2 (2017): 144–64. https://doi.org/10.1525/MP.2017.35.2.144

11. Berlioz, Hector. Gran Traité d’Instrumentation et d’Orchestration Modernes. Paris: Schonenberger, 1855.

12. Vygotsky, Lev. Psychology of the Art. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks Publ., 1925/1998. (In Russian)

13. Agricola, Martin. Musica Instrumentalis Deudsch. Wittenberg: Georg Rhaw, 1529.

14. Praetorius, Michael. Syntagma Musicum. Wolfenbüttel: Michael Praetorius, 1620.

15. Mersenne, Martin. Harmonie Universelle. Paris: Sebastien Cramoisy, 1636, vol. 1.

16. Mersenne, Martin. Harmonie Universelle. Paris: Pierre Ballard, 1637, vol. 2.

17. Carse, Adam. The History of Orchestration. New York: Dover Publications, 1964.

18. Francoeur, Louis-Joseph. Diapason Général de Tous Les Instrumens à Vent. Paris: Le Marchand, 1772.

19. Vandenbroek, Othon-Joseph. Traité Général de Tous Les Instrumens à Vent. Paris: Boyer, 1793.

20. LeDhuy, Adolphe. Petite Encyclopédie Instrumentale. Paris: Schonenberger, 1833.

21. Casella, Alfredo, and Virgilio Mortari. La Técnica de La Orquesta Contemporánea [The Technique of Contemporary Orchestra]. Buenos Aires: Ricordi, 1970.

22. Popov, Sergey. Instrumentology. St Petersburg: Planeta Muzyki Publ., 2019. (In Russian)

23. Bonds, Mark Evan. A History of Music in Western Culture. New York: Pearson, 2013.

24. Kastner, Jean-Georges. Cours d’Instrumentation. Paris: A. Meissonnier et J. L. Heugel, 1837.

25. Prout, Ebenezer. The Orchestra. 2 vol. London: Augener & Co, 1899, vol. 2.

26. Kling, Henri. Modern Orchestration and Instrumentation. New York: C. Fischer, 1905.

27. Hofmann, Richard. Praktische Instrumentationslehre. Leipzig: Dörffling & Franke, 1893, vol. 5.

28. Borch, Gaston. Practical Manual of Instrumentation. Boston: Boston Music Co., 1918.

29. Rimsky-Korsakov, Nikolay. Principles of Orchestration. Ed. by Maximilian Steinberg. St Petersburg: Editions Russes de Musique, 1913. (In Russian)

30. Fidler, Florence. A Handbook of Orchestration. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., 1921.

31. Piston, Walter. Orchestration. London: Gollancz, 1969/1980.

32. Eisner, Elliot W. “From Episteme to Phronesis to Artistry in the Study and Improvement of Teaching”. Teaching and Teacher Education 18, no. 4 (2002), 375–85.

33. Banshchikov, Gennady. Principles of Functional Instrumentation. Moscow: Kompositor Publ., 1999. (In Russian)

34. Alexandra, Liana. Techniques of Orchestration. Bucharest: Nuova musica consonante, 2000.

35. Brant, Henry. Textures and Timbres: An Orchestrator’s Handbook. New York: Carl Fischer, 2009.

36. Berg, Richard, and David Stork. The Physics of Sound. San Francisco: Pearson, 2005.

37. Koechlin, Charles. Traité de l’Orchestration. Paris: Éditions Max Eschig, 1956.

38. Adler, Samuel. The Study of Orchestration. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2002.

39. Dodson, Chad S., Marcia K. Johnson, and Jonathan W. Schooler. “The Verbal Overshadowing Effect: Why Descriptions Impair Face Recognition”. Memory & Cognition 25, no. 2 (1997): 129–39. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201107

40. Blatter, Alfred. Instrumentation/Orchestration. New York: Schirmer Books, 1997.

41. Bregman, Albert S. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2006.

42. Sandell, Gregory J. “Analysis of Concurrent Timbres with an Auditory Model”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (1994): 2958. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.409050

43. Sandell, Gregory J., and Christopher J. Darwin. “Recognition of Concurrently sounding Musical Instruments with Different Fundamental Frequencies”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, no. 4 (1996): 2683. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.416079

44. Devutzkiy, Vladislav. “Peculiarities of Timbral Dramaturgy in the Third Symphony”. Problemy Muzykalnoi Nauki 1, (2015): 108–19. (In Russian)

45. Slonimskaia, Raisa. “Orchestral Dramaturgy in Prokofiev’s 3rd Symphony Scherzo”. Trudy Sankt-Peterburgskogo Gosudarstvennogo Instituta Kultury, no. 191 (2011): 138–46. (In Russian)

46. Lenzon, Viktor. “On Personification of Musical Instruments in Fine Arts”. Vestnik Moskovskogo Gosudahstvennogo Universiteta Kultury i Iskusstv 3, no. 65 (2015): 75–80. (In Russian)

47. Sarzhant, Aleksandr. “Specificity of Timbral Dramaturgy in Dmitriev’s ‘Sybilla’ for Flute and Chamber Orchestra”. Manuscript 12, no. 5 (2019): 158–63. (In Russian)

48. Kotikova, Tatiana, Viktor Kovalenko, and Liudmila Sushkova. “On the Function of Bass Timbre in the Work of D. Schostakovich”. In Nauka. Kultura. Iskusstvo: Aktualnyie Problemy Teorii i Praktiki (12 fevralia 2020), comp. by Iulia Bovkunova, Sergey Zenin, and Aleksey Shakmakov, 157–60.Belgrade: Belgorodskii Gosudarstvennyi Institut Iskusstv i Kultury Publ., 2020. (In Russian)

49. Tashlykova, Natalia, and. Elena Shabashevich. “‘Family Leitmotif ’ in the Musical Dramaturgy of Christian Shpuk’s Ballet ‘Anna Karenina’.” In Sintez v Russkoi i Mirovoi Kulture (23–25 noiabria 2016),comp. by Irina Mineralova, 230–235. Iaroslavl: Agenstvo “Litera” Publ., 2017. (In Russian)

50. Ostromogilskii, Ilia. “‘Stylistic Domain’ in Sonoric Music of the Second Half of the XX Century”. Izvestia Rossiyskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena 153, no. 1 (2012): 69–73. (In Russian)