Moscow — Berlin: The Photomontage in Illustrated Magazines of the 1920s
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2024.110Abstract
This paper presents the historical experience of organizing the visual space of an illustrated magazine and its artistic design by means of photography. Attention is focused on the application of photomontage in the demonstrated samples of printed publications of the Soviet Union and Weimar Germany in the 1920s. Special attention is paid to the features of the artistic appearance of the Soviet illustrated magazine “Smena” (Moscow), which began publishing in 1924, and the German workers’ illustrated newspaper “Arbeiter-Illustrierte Zeitung” (Berlin), which published photographic materials since 1925. These publications became a symbol of the use of photomontage in the first post-revolutionary decade in the world illustrated periodicals. In the years of the avant-garde, photomontage became a method of forming an artistic composition through the efforts of the Berlin Dada and Soviet constructivists. And in propaganda works it becomes a method of constructing a fact that convinces and motivates the reader. The replacement of illustration by photography and photomontage was accelerated in illustrated magazines. This happened especially vividly in the 1920s, when new artistic techniques for creating imagery. The result of the study is the revealed specificity of the use of photomontage within the framework of two paradigms: Dadaism and constructivism, and their influence on the artistic appearance of Soviet and German illustrated magazines of the 1920s. The predominance of mainly constructivist ideas is shown both in the magazine “Smena” and in “Arbeiter-Illustrierte Zeitung”, despite the German roots of avant-garde photomontage. The result of the comparative analysis was the thesis about the initial influence of Moscow on Berlin within the framework of the visual strategy of propaganda periodicals. At the end of the decade under review, this vector began to change its orientation, and already Soviet illustrated magazines were looking at the work of German colleagues in terms of photomontage developments. And here the undisputed leadership in visual innovations belonged to “Arbeiter-Illustrierte Zeitung”.
Keywords:
illustrated magazine, Berlin Dada, constructivism, agitation art, photomontage, avant-garde photography, pictorial statistics, “Smena”, “Arbeiter-Illustrierte Zeitung”
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
1. Асеев, Николай. “1-е Мая”. ЛЕФ, no. 2 (1923): 6–7.
2. Беньямин, Вальтер. Краткая история фотографии. Пер. Сергея Ромашко. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2013.
3. Сонтаг, Сьюзен. О фотографии. Пер. Виктора Голышева. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2013.
4. Аверьянова, Ольга. “Инверсия реалистического в фотографических практиках модернизма”. Международный журнал исследований культуры 39, no. 2 (2020): 104–16. https://doi.org/10.24411/2079-1100-2020-00025
5. Фоменко, Андрей. Советский фотоавангард и концепция производственно-утилитарного искусства. СПб.: С.-Петерб. гос. ун-т промышл. технологий и дизайна, 2011.
6. Руйе, Андре. Фотография. Между документом и современным искусством. Пер. Марины Михайловой. СПб.: Клаудберри, 2014.
7. Стигнеев, Валерий. “Формирование жанра фоторепортажа в советской фотографии 1920-х гг.”. Художественная культура 24, no. 2 (2018): 168–93.
8. Rössler, Patrick. Illustrated Magazine of the Times: A Lost Bauhaus Book by László Moholy-Nagy and Joost Schmidt — an Attempt at Construction. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 2019.
9. Kriebel, Sabina. Revolutionary Beauty: The Radical Photomontages of John Heartfield. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014.
10. Фоменко, Андрей. Монтаж, фактография, эпос. Производственное движение и фотография. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2007.
11. Botar, Oliver. “László Moholy-Nagys. New Vision and the Aestheticization of Scientific Photography in Weimar Germany”. Science in Context 4, no. 17 (2004): 525–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889704000250
12. Глинтерник, Элеонора. Реклама в России XVIII — первой половины XX века: опыт иллюстрированных очерков. СПб.: Аврора, 2007.
13. Третьяков, Сергей. Джон Хартфильд. М.: Гос. изд-во изобр. иск., 1936.
14. Ades, Don. Photomontage. London: Thames and Hudson, 1996.
15. Zervigón, Andres Mario. John Heartfield and the Agitated Image: Photography, Persuasion, and the Rise of Avant-Garde Photomontage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
16. Лаптев, Владимир. “Париж — Москва. ‘VU’ в авангарде искусства фотожурналистики”. Декоративное искусство и предметно-пространственная среда. Вестник МГХПА им. С. Г. Строганова, no. 2/2 (2021): 29–42.
17. Лаптев, Владимир. “Москва — Париж. Визуальный нарратив в журнале ‘Regards’”. Декоративное искусство и предметно-пространственная среда. Вестник МГХПА им. С. Г. Строганова, no. 3/2 (2022): 55–69. https://doi.org/10.37485/1997-4663_2022_3_2_55_69
18. Лаптев, Владимир. “Монтаж впечатлений в иллюстрированном журнале ‘Voilà’”. Декоративное искусство и предметно-пространственная среда. Вестник РГХПУ им. С. Г. Строганова, no. 4/3 (2022): 170–83. https://doi.org/10.37485/1997-4663_2022_4_3_170_183
19. Рихтер, Ханс. Дада — искусство и антиискусство. Вклад дадаистов в искусство XX века. Пер. Татьяны Набатниковой. М.: Гилея, 2018.
20. Hausmann, Raoul. “Fotomontage”. A bis Z 2, no. 16 (1931): 61–2.
21. Грос, Жорж. “Рисунки”. ЛЕФ, no. 2 (1923): 27–30.
22. Курбановский, Алексей. “‘Несанкционированное поведение всего’. Коллаж — Дада — ‘теория отстранения’”. Искусствознание, no. 1 (2021): 66–103.
23. Попова, Любовь. “Фото-монтаж”. ЛЕФ, no. 4 (1923): 41–4.
24. Клуцис, Густав. “Фотомонтаж как новый вид агитационного искусства”. В кн. Изофронт. Классовая борьба на фронте пространственных искусств, под ред. Павла Новицкого, 119–32. М.; Л.: ОГИЗ-ИЗОГИЗ, 1931.
25. Кулешов, Лев. “Монтаж”. ЛЕФ, no. 3 (1922): 11–2.
26. Korff, Kurt. “Die illustrierte Zeitschrift”. In Weimar Republic Sourcebook, eds Anton Kaes, Martin Jay and Edward Dimendberg, 646–7. Berkeley [etc.]: University of California Press, 1994.
27. Stolz, Nicole. “Arbeiterfotografie. Klassenkampf in Bildern”. GA 2. Kunstgeschichtliches Journal für Studentische Forschung und Kritik, no. 5/1 (2020): 100–13.
28. Ohrn, Karin, and Hanno Hardt. “Who Photographs Us?” The Workers’ Photography Movement in Weimar Germany. Boston: Association for Education in Journalism, 1980.
29. Spaulding, Daniel. “John Heartfield’s Communism”. Historical Materialism 25, no. 3 (2017): 223–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341532
30. Zervigón, Andres Mario. “L’image prolétarienne entre agitation politique et sobriété réaliste. L’Arbeiter Illustrierte Zeitung et le mouvement photographique ouvrier allemand”. Transbordeur. Photographie histoire société, no. 4 (2020): 38–49.
31. Becher, Lilly. “Vorwort”. In Willmann, Heinz. Geschichte der Arbeiter-Illustrierten Zeitung, 7–11. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1974.
32. Wolf, Eika. The Worker Photography Movement [1926–1939]: Essays and Documents. Ed. by Béla Albertini. [S. l.]: T. F. Editores, 2011.
33. Knöferle, Karl. Die Fotoreportage in Deutschland von 1925 bis 1935: eine empirische Studie zur Geschichte der illustrierten Presse in der Periode der Durchsetzung des Fotojournalismus. Hitzhofen: Karl Knöferle, 2014.
34. Dussel, Konrad. “‘Fotografische Allgegenwart’? Hitler-Bilder in der Presse des NS-Staats”. Publizistik, no. 64 (2019): 447–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-019-00532-z
35. Heller, Steven. Merz to Emigre and Beyond: Avant-Garde Magazine Design of the Twentieth Century. London: Phaidon Press, 2003.
36. Bolvig, Axel. “30’ernes fotoreportage”. Bogvennen (1980): 87–93.
37. Kriebel, Sabina. “Photomontage in the Year 1932: John Heartfield and the National Socialists”. Oxford Art Journal 31, no. 1 (2008): 97–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxartj/kcn007
38. Buller, Rachel. “Controlled Chaos: A Case Study of Photomontage in Weimar”. In Reworking the German Past: Adaptations in Film, the Arts, and Popular Culture, 39–56. Rochester: Camden House, 2010.
References
1. Aseev, Nikolai. “1st May”. LEF, no. 2 (1923): 6–7. (In Russian)
2. Benjamin, Walter. A Short History of Photography. Rus. ed. Transl. by Sergey Romashko. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2013. (In Russian)
3. Sontag, Susan. On Photography. Rus. ed. Transl. by Viktor Golyshev. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2013. (In Russian)
4. Averyanova, Olga. “The inversion of the realistic in the photographic practices of modernism”. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal issledovanii kul’tury 39, no. 2 (2020): 104–16. https://doi.org/10.24411/2079-1100-2020-00025 (In Russian)
5. Fomenko, Andrey. The Soviet photo avant-garde and the concept of industrial and utilitarian art. St Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskii gosudarstvennyi universitet tekhnologii i dizaina Publ., 2011. (In Russian)
6. Rouillet, Andre. Photography. Between the document and contemporary art. Rus. ed. Transl. by Marina Michailova. St Petersburg: Cloudberry Publ., 2014. (In Russian)
7. Stigneev, Valeriy. “Formation of the Photo Reportage Genre in Soviet Photography of the 1920s”. Khudozhestvennaia kul’tura 24, no. 2 (2018): 168–93. (In Russian)
8. Rössler, Patrick. Illustrated Magazine of the Times: A Lost Bauhaus Book by László Moholy-Nagy and Joost Schmidt — an Attempt at Construction. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 2019.
9. Kriebel, Sabina. Revolutionary Beauty: The Radical Photomontages of John Heartfield. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014.
10. Fomenko, Andrey. Montage, factography, epic. Production movement and photography. St Petersburg: St Petersburg University Press, 2007. (In Russian)
11. Botar, Oliver. “László Moholy-Nagys. New Vision and the Aestheticization of Scientific Photography in Weimar Germany”. Science in Context 4, no. 17 (2004): 525–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889704000250
12. Glinternik, Eleonora. Advertising in Russia of the 17th — first half of the 20th century: The experience of illustrated essays. St Petersburg: Avrora Publ., 2007. (In Russian)
13. Tret’iakov, Sergei. John Hartfield. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo izobrazitel’nogo iskusstva Publ., 1936. (In Russian)
14. Ades, Don. Photomontage. London: Thames and Hudson, 1996.
15. Zervigón, Andres Mario. John Heartfield and the Agitated Image: Photography, Persuasion, and the Rise of Avant-Garde Photomontage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
16. Laptev, Vladimir. “Paris — Moscow. ‘VU’ in the avant-garde of the art of photojournalism”. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo i predmetno-prostranstvennaya sreda. Vestnik MGKhPA im. S. G. Stroganova, no. 2/2 (2021): 29–42. (In Russian)
17. Laptev, Vladimir. “Moscow — Paris. Visual narrative in the magazine ‘Regards’”. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo i predmetno-prostranstvennaya sreda. Vestnik MGKhPA im. S. G. Stroganova, no. 3/2 (2022): 55–69. https://doi.org/10.37485/1997-4663_2022_3_2_55_69 (In Russian)
18. Laptev, Vladimir. “Montage of impressions in the illustrated magazine ‘Voilà’”. Dekorativnoe iskusstvo i predmetno-prostranstvennaya sreda. Vestnik RGKhPU im. S. G. Stroganova, no. 4/3 (2022): 170–83. https://doi.org/10.37485/1997-4663_2022_4_3_170_183 (In Russian)
19. Richter, Hans. Dada — art and anti-art. The contribution of Dadaists to the art of the 20th century. Rus. ed. Transl. by Tatiana Nabatnikova. Moscow: Gileia Publ., 2018. (In Russian)
20. Hausmann, Raoul. “Fotomontage”. A bis Z 2, no. 16 (1931): 61–2.
21. Grosz, George. “Drawings”. LEF, no. 2 (1923): 27–30. (In Russian)
22. Kurbanovskii, Alexey. “‘Unauthorized behavior of everything’. Collage — Dada — ‘the theory of detachment’”. Iskusstvoznanie, no. 1. (2021): 66–103. (In Russian)
23. Popova, Lubov. “Photo-montage”. LEF, no. 4 (1923): 41–4. (In Russian)
24. Klucis, Gustav. “Photomontage as a new kind of propaganda art”. In Izofront. Klassovaia bor’ba na fronte prostranstvennykh iskusstv, 119–32. Moscow; Leningrad: OGIZ-IZOGIZ Publ., 1931. (In Russian)
25. Kuleshov, Lev. “Montage”. LEF, no. 3 (1922): 11–2. (In Russian)
26. Korff, Kurt. “Die illustrierte Zeitschrift”. In Weimar Republic Sourcebook, 646–7. Berkeley [etc.]: University of California Press, 1994.
27. Stolz, Nicole. “Arbeiterfotografie. Klassenkampf in Bildern”. GA 2. Kunstgeschichtliches Journal für Studentische Forschung und Kritik, no. 5/1 (2020): 100–13.
28. Ohrn, Karin, and Hanno Hardt. “Who Photographs Us?” The Workers’ Photography Movement in Weimar Germany. Boston: Association for Education in Journalism, 1980.
29. Spaulding, Daniel. “John Heartfield’s Communism”. Historical Materialism 25, no. 3 (2017): 223–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341532
30. Zervigón, Andres Mario. “L’image prolétarienne entre agitation politique et sobriété réaliste. L’Arbeiter Illustrierte Zeitung et le mouvement photographique ouvrier allemand”. Transbordeur. Photographie histoire société, no. (2020): 38–49.
31. Becher, Lilly. “Vorwort”. In Willmann, Heinz. Geschichte der Arbeiter-Illustrierten Zeitung, 7–11. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1974.
32. Wolf, Eika. The Worker Photography Movement [1926–1939]: Essays and Documents. Ed. by Béla Albertini. [S. l.]: T. F. Editores, 2011.
33. Knöferle, Karl. Die Fotoreportage in Deutschland von 1925 bis 1935: eine empirische Studie zur Geschichte der illustrierten Presse in der Periode der Durchsetzung des Fotojournalismus. Hitzhofen: Karl Knöferle, 2014.
34. Dussel, Konrad. “‘Fotografische Allgegenwart’? Hitler-Bilder in der Presse des NS-Staats”. Publizistik, no. 64 (2019): 447–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-019-00532-z
35. Heller, Steven. Merz to Emigre and Beyond: Avant-Garde Magazine Design of the Twentieth Century. London: Phaidon Press, 2003.
36. Bolvig, Axel. “30’ernes fotoreportage”. Bogvennen (1980): 87–93.
37. Kriebel, Sabina. “Photomontage in the Year 1932: John Heartfield and the National Socialists”. Oxford Art Journal 31, no. 1 (2008): 97–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxartj/kcn007
38. Buller, Rachel. “Controlled Chaos: A Case Study of Photomontage in Weimar”. In Reworking the German Past: Adaptations in Film, the Arts, and Popular Culture, 39–56. Rochester: Camden House, 2010.
Downloads
Published
2024-05-23
How to Cite
Laptev, V. V. (2024). Moscow — Berlin: The Photomontage in Illustrated Magazines of the 1920s. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts, 14(1), 186–212. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2024.110
Issue
Section
Design
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
