Time Code in Modern Art: Discoursive Analysis of Temporal Art-Projects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2021.109

Abstract

The article explores the influence of the concept of time on modern art practices, as well as the impact of digital media on the ability of art to anticipate the future. The methodology of discourse analysis is used as a tool to reveal temporal characteristics and the communicative potential of relevant art projects. The digital age creates a simultaneous world in which one can perceive the future by being deeply involved in the present moment. Contemporary artists have the ability to grasp changes hidden from the majority, and to formalize them in works of art. The simultaneous perception of time becomes the clue to the development of this ability, while the concept of time becomes the clue to understanding the message contained in the work of art. As a result, the task of the researcher is to discover the temporal dimensions of the relevant art projects and to examine the nature of interaction between the viewer and the work of art. Taking this into consideration, special attention should be given to the method of involving the viewer in the semantic space of the artwork. The subject of analysis is the communicative model of the artwork, which is presented as a flexible, mobile semantic structure that activates the viewer’s imagination and his ability to improvise. The methodological framework for understanding the communicative model was the neo‐pragmatism theory of social action and practice-oriented social semiotics. The interpretation of the work of art as a communicative event actualizes the discourse analysis that allows us to perceive the artwork in its dynamics and to explore its’ temporal dimensions. At the same time, the discourse analysis is represented not only as an effective research tool, but also as a resource that helps the artist, the researcher and the viewer to develop a flexible and conceptual mindset.

Keywords:

modern art, digital environment, time model, simultaneity art-project, interactivity, communicative format, discourse analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biography

Galina N. Lola, Saint Petersburg State University

Dr. Habil. in Philosophy, Professor

References

Литература

1. McLuhan, Herbert Marshall. Understanding Media. The Extension of Man. London: The MIT Press, 1994.

2. Levin, David Michael. The Opening of Vision. Nihilism and the Postmodern Situation. New York; London: Routledge,1988.

3. Барт, Ролан. Избранные работы. Семиотика. Поэтика. Пер. c фр. Сост., общ. ред. и вступ. ст. Г.Косиков. М.: Прогресс; Универс, 1994.

4. Манович, Лев. Язык новых медиа. Пер. Диана Кульчицкая. М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс, 2018.

5. Metahaven. Digital Tarkovsky. Moscow: Strelka Press, 2018.

6. Dolezel, Lubomir. Heterocosmica. Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1998.

7. Wilson, Stephen. Аrt + Science Now. How Scientific Research and Technological Innovation are becoming key to 21st-Сentury Aesthetics. London: Thames & Hudson, 2010.

8. Dunne, Anthony, and Fiona Raby. Speculative Everything. Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press, 2013.

9. Казаринова, Надежда. Межличностная коммуникация: социально-конструкционистский анализ. СПб.: ЛЭТИ, 2006.

10. Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books, 1966.

11. Bourdieu, Pierre. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1990.

12. Thiboult, Paul John. Social Semiotics as Praxis. Text, Social Meaning Making, and Nabokov’s Ada. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991. (Theory and History of Literature).

13. Эко, Умберто. Отсутствующая структура. Введение в семиологию. Пер. А.Погоняйло, В.Розник. СПб.: Петрополис, 1998.

14. Gasparov, Boris. Speech, Memory, and Meaning: Intertextuality in Everyday Language. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2010. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, bk. 214).

15. Kwastek, Katja. Aesthetics of Interaction in Digital Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.

16. Делез, Жиль. Кино. Пер. Борис Скуратов. М.: Ад Маргинем, 2019.

17. Studio Olafur Eliasson. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://www.olafureliasson.net/.

18. “Ice Watch”. Studio Olafur Eliasson. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://olafureliasson.net/archive/artwork/WEK109190/ice-watchslideshow.

19. “Waterfall”. Studio Olafur Eliasson. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://olafureliasson.net/archive/artwork/WEK110140/waterfallslideshow.

20. “Human Time is Movement”. Studio Olafur Eliasson. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://olafureliasson.net/archive/artwork/WEK110909/human-time-is-movement-spring slideshow.

21. “Fog Assembly”. Studio Olafur Eliasson. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://olafureliasson.net/archive/artwork/WEK110139/fog-assembly slideshow.

22. Massey, Doreen. “Some Times of Space”. In Olafur Eliasson. The Weather Project: Exhibition Catalogue, ed. by Susan May, 107–18. London: Tate Publishing, 2003.

23. Kuo, Michelle Y., and Anna Engberg-Pedersen. Olafur Eliasson. Experience. Ed. by Anna Engberg-Pedersen. London; New York: Phaidon Press, 2018.

24. “Seiko Mikami. ‘Desire of Codes’”. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://special.ycam.jp/doc/work/index_en.html.

25. “Seiko Mikami. ‘Desire of Codes’”. Archive of Digital Art. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://www.digitalartarchive.at/database/general/work/desire-of-codes.html.

26. Голдинг, Уильям. Свободное падение. Пер. И.Судакевич. М.: АСТ, 2018. (Эксклюзивная классика).

27. “Dictionary of the Khazars (The Catcher)”. vimeo. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://vimeo.com/320450064.

28. Lola, Galina. “Design Of Communicative Event: The ‘Communicative Navigation’ Method”. In European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, ed. by O. Shipunova, V.Volkova, A.Nordmann, L.Moccozet, 465–72. London: European Publisher, 2020, vol. LXXX. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.03.02.54.

References

1. McLuhan, Herbert Marshall. Understanding Media. The Extension of Man. London: MIT Press, 1994.

2. Levin, David Michael. The Opening of Vision. Nihilism and the Postmodern Situation. New York; London: Routledge,1988.

3. Barthes, Roland. Selected Works. Semiotics. Poetics. Rus. ed. Comp., ed. and foreword by G.Kosikov. Moscow: Progress Publ.; Univers Publ., 1994. (In Russian)

4. Manovich, Lev. The Language of New Media. Rus. ed. Transl. by Diana Kul’chitskaia. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2018. (In Russian)

5. Metahaven. Digital Tarkovsky. Moscow: Strelka Press, 2018.

6. Dolezel, Lubomir. Heterocosmica. Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1998.

7. Wilson, Stephen. Аrt + Science Now. How Scientific Research and Technological Innovation are becoming key to 21st-Сentury Aesthetics. London: Thames & Hudson, 2010.

8. Dunne, Anthony, and Fiona Raby. Speculative Everything. Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press, 2013.

9. Kazarinova, Nadezhda. The Interpersonal Communication: Social Constructionist Analysis. St. Petersburg: LETI Publ., 2006. (In Russian)

10. Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books, 1966.

11. Bourdieu, Pierre. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1990.

12. Thiboult, Paul John. Social Semiotics as Praxis. Text, Social Meaning Making, and Nabokov’s Ada. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991. (Theory and History of Literature).

13. Eko, Umberto. The Absent Structure. Introduction to Semiology. Rus. ed. Transl. by A.Pogoniailo, V.Roznik. St. Petersburg: Petropolis Publ., 1998. (In Russian)

14. Gasparov, Boris. Speech, Memory, and Meaning: Intertextuality in Everyday Language. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2010. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, bk. 214).

15. Kwastek, Katja. Aesthetics of Interaction in Digital Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.

16. Deleuze, Gilles. Cinematography. Transl. by Boris Skurativ. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 2019.

17. Studio Olafur Eliasson. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://www.olafureliasson.net/.

18. “Ice Watch”. Studio Olafur Eliasson. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://olafureliasson.net/archive/artwork/WEK109190/ice-watchslideshow.

19. “Waterfall”. Studio Olafur Eliasson. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://olafureliasson.net/archive/artwork/WEK110140/waterfallslideshow.

20. “Human Time is Movement”. Studio Olafur Eliasson. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://olafureliasson.net/archive/artwork/WEK110909/human-time-is-movement-springslideshow.

21. “Fog Assembly”. Studio Olafur Eliasson. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://olafureliasson.net/archive/artwork/WEK110139/fog-assemblyslideshow.

22. Massey, Doreen. “Some Times of Space”. In Olafur Eliasson. The Weather Project: Exhibition Catalogue, ed. by Susan May, 107–18. London: Tate Publishing, 2003.

23. Kuo, Michelle Y., and Anna Engberg-Pedersen. Olafur Eliasson. Experience. Ed. by Anna Engberg-Pedersen. London; New York: Phaidon Press, 2018.

24. “Seiko Mikami. ‘Desire of Codes’”. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://special.ycam.jp/doc/work/index_en.html.

25. “Seiko Mikami. ‘Desire of Codes’”. Archive of Digital Art. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://www.digitalartarchive.at/database/general/work/desire-of-codes.html.

26. Golding, William. Free Fall. Rus. ed. Transl. by I. Sudakevich. Moscow: AST Publ., 2018. (Ekskliuzivnaia klassika). (In Russian)

27. “Dictionary of the Khazars (The Catcher)”. vimeo. Accessed May 15, 2020. https://vimeo.com/320450064.

28. Lola, Galina. “Design Of Communicative Event: The ‘Communicative Navigation’ Method”. In European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, ed. by O. Shipunova, V.Volkova, A.Nordmann, L.Moccozet, 465–72. London: European Publisher, 2020, vol. LXXX. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.03.02.54.

Published

2021-03-24

How to Cite

Lola, G. N. ., & Aleksandrova, T. I. . (2021). Time Code in Modern Art: Discoursive Analysis of Temporal Art-Projects. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts, 11(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2021.109

Issue

Section

Visual arts