The processes of contemporary art in China and the Russian-Chinese University humanities project in St. Petersburg (2016–2017)

Authors

  • Peng Feng Peking University
  • Tatiana S. Yurieva Saint Petersburg State University
  • Grigorii L. Tulchinskii Saint Petersburg State University; National Research University “Higher School of Economics”,
  • Ekaterina Iu. Staniukovich-Denisova Saint Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu15.2017.404

Abstract

In this article the issue of the creative activities of young artists from Russia and China representing the new generation of the 21st century is emphasized in historiography for the first time. The analysis is based on the material, produced during a collaborative project which began in 2015. The project in question features both cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural approaches, that are essential for liberal education. For the first time in world culture, a history of one cultural space is being formed. In this space a new generation, which emphasizes its own identity, is acting, while challenging, feeling and recognizing its own 21st century. A renowned Professor of Peking University and art historian Peng Feng, contributes to a dialogue between Russian and Chinese artists regarding the nature of the modern Chinese art.

Keywords:

Russia, China, contemporary art, liberation, generation, cultural space

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biographies

Peng Feng, Peking University

professor of the School of Arts at the Peking University

Tatiana S. Yurieva, Saint Petersburg State University

Dr. Habil.

Grigorii L. Tulchinskii, Saint Petersburg State University; National Research University “Higher School of Economics”,

Dr. Habil.

References

References

1. Osvobozhdenie nastoiashchego ot proshlogo. Sovremennoe iskusstvo Kitaia. Katalog [Liberation of the present from the past. Contemporary art of China. Catalogue]. St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Dean Publ., 2015, 91 p. (In Russian)

2. Zapad est Zapad? Vostok est Vostok? [The West is the West? The East Is the East?]. Materials of the International conference. St. Petersburg, 2016, 100 p. (In Russian and in English)

3. Kitai. Rossiia. SShA. Osobennosti refleksii kul'turnogo opyta v XXI veke. Tezisy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii [China. Russia. USA. Features of the reflection of cultural experience in the XXI century. Materials of the International conference]. St. Petersburg, 2016, 95 p. (In Russian)

4. Kitai-Rossiia [China-Russia]. Art generation-XXI century. Katalog. Sankt-Peterburg 30.03-23.04 2017 [St. Petersburg 30.03-23.04 2017. Catalogue]. Ed. T. S. Yurieva. St.Petersburg, 2017. 27 p. (In Russian)

5. Neglinskaya M. A. Ob aktual'nykh tendentsiiakh sovremennogo kitaiskogo iskusstva i perspektivakh ego izucheniia [On the current trends of modern Chinese art and the prospects for its study]. Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitae: XL nauchnaia konferentsiia. Moscow, Institute of Oriental studies Publ., 2010, pp. 403–414. (In Russian)

6. Van Fei. Sovremennoe iskusstvo Kitaia v kontekste mirovogo khudozhestvennogo protsessa. Diss. kand. iskusstv. nauk [Modern art of China in the context of the world artistic process. Thesis of Art sci. diss.] Moscow, Russian Academy of arts, 2008, 212 p. (In Russian)

7. Dukhovnaia kul'tura Kitaia. Entsiklopediia. T. 6. (dopolnitel'nyi). Iskusstvo [Spiritual culture of China. Encyclopedia, vol. 6 (additional)]. Ed. M. Titarenko. Moscow, Vostochnaia literatura Publ., 2010. 1031 p. (In Russian)

8. Boltanski L., Teveno L. Kritika i obosnovanie spravedlivosti [Criticism and the justification of justice]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2013. 576 p. (In Russian)

9. Habermas J. Mezhdu naturalizmom i religiei. Filosofskie stat'i [Between naturalism and religion. Philosophical articles]. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ., 2011. 336 p. (In Russian)

10. Khoruzhii S. S. Postsekuliarizm i antropologiia [Post-secularism and anthropology]. Chelovek.ru. no. 8 (2012), pp. 15–34. (In Russian)

11. Foster H. (ed.) The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture. New York, The New Press, 1998, 159 p.

12. Belting H. The End of the History of Art? Transl. by Chr. S. Wood. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1987. 120 p.

13. Danto A. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1997. 272 p.

14. Jameson F. Postmodernism or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC., Duke University Press, 1991. 438 p.

15. Yigui Zou. Small Mountain Painting Copybook (Xiaoshan Huapu), in Ye Lang (ed.), The Collected Aesthetics Materials in All Previous Dynasties (Lidai Meixue Wenku), Vol. 15, Beijing, Gaodeng Jiaoyu Press, 2002, p. 340.

16. Sullivan M. Art and Artists of Twentieth-Century China. Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1996, 392 p.

17. Vine R. Venice Welcomes a Chinese Pavilion for the Nose. Available at: http://www.artinamericamagazine.com/news-features/news/chinese-pavilion-venice-biennale/ (accessed: 12.01.2017).

18. Vine R. China’s New Normal in Venice. Available at: http://www.artinamericamagazine.com/news-features/news/china-venice-biennale/ (accessed: 12.01.2017).

19. Armstrong J. The Contested Gallery: Street Art, Ethnography and the Search for Urban Understandings. AmeriQuests, vol. 2, no. 1 (2005). Available at: http://ejournals.library.vanderbilt.edu/index.php/ameriquests/article/view/46/37 (accessed: 12.01.2017).

Downloads

Published

2017-10-18

How to Cite

Feng, P., Yurieva, T. S. ., Tulchinskii, G. L., & Staniukovich-Denisova, E. I. . (2017). The processes of contemporary art in China and the Russian-Chinese University humanities project in St. Petersburg (2016–2017). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts, 7(4), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu15.2017.404

Issue

Section

Visual arts