Screen art space: the real and the imaginary

Authors

Abstract

Screen space is just a reflection of reality, that is why interpreting the cinema in terms of such concepts as “real” and “imaginary” one means, of course, conventionally real and conventionally imaginary. Already in films of the silent period one can see the various ways of combination of a real and imaginary art space. In the sound film the combination of the real and the unreal becomes one of the essential dramatic and visual techniques. The authors, considering the peculiarities of perception of the viewer, allow him to understand where the real and unreal screen space is using images and sound. In the article there is no survey of aesthetic features of fantastic, dreamlike and virtual space. The main attention is paid to the interpretation of episodes representing protagonist’s imagination in the films of the 20th and beginning of 21st century. The imaginary situations are considered here as the visualization of escapism, i. e. human desire to escape from reality. A characteristic stylistic features of the imaginary in these cases are the irony and game elements. With the development of film art techniques the methods for combining screen chronotopes denoting the real and the imaginary are becoming more diverse.

Keywords:

cinema, screen art space, real and imaginary in the cinema, escapism

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vitaly F. Poznin, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg State University of Cinema and Television

Dr. Habil., professor

References

Литература

1. Славой Ж. «Матрица», или Две стороны извращения / пер. с англ. Н. Цыркун // Искусство кино. 2000. № 6. С. 89–99.

2. Феллини Ф. Мой трюк — режиссура: [Запись рассказов кинорежиссера о себе] / Феллини Ф., Чэндлер Ш. // Искусство кино. 2002. N 4. С. 151–172.

3. Капрелова М. Б. Типы художественной реальности в структуре кинообраза: дис. … канд. искусствоведения. СПб.: Российский институт истории искусств, 2005. 157 с.

4. Фрит К. Мозг и душа. Как нервная деятельность формирует наш внутренний мир. М.: Астрель, 2010. 335 c.

5. Лотман Ю. Семиотика кино и проблемы киноэстетики. Таллинн: Ээсти Раамат, 1973. 138 с.

6. Эйзенштейн С. М. Избранные произведения в 6 т. М.: Искусство, 1964. Т. 2. 568 с.

References

1. Slavoi Zh. «Matritsa», ili Dve storony izvrashcheniia, per. s angl. N. Tsyrkun. Iskusstvo kino. 2000. № 6. p. 89–99.

2. Fellini F. Moi triuk — rezhissura: [Zapis' rasskazov kinorezhissera o sebe], Fellini F., Chendler Sh. Iskusstvo kino. 2002. N 4, p. 151–172.

3. Kaprelova M. B. Tipy khudozhestvennoi real'nosti v strukture kinoobraza: dis. … kand. iskusstvovedeniia. SPb.: Rossiiskii institut istorii iskusstv, 2005. 157 p.

4. Frit K. Mozg i dusha. Kak nervnaia deiatel'nost' formiruet nash vnutrennii mir. M.: Astrel', 2010. 335 p.

5. Lotman Iu. Semiotika kino i problemy kinoestetiki. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat, 1973. 138 p.

6. Eizenshtein S. M. Izbrannye proizvedeniia v 6 t. M.: Iskusstvo, 1964. T. 2. 568 p.

Published

2015-03-11

How to Cite

Poznin, V. F. . (2015). Screen art space: the real and the imaginary. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts, 5(1), 18–25. Retrieved from https://artsjournal.spbu.ru/article/view/2288

Issue

Section

Cinematography