“Archetypal Forms” in Modern Sculpture. The Image of Reclining Figure: From Maillol to Moore, and so On

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2019.307

Abstract

On the basis of selected examples from the history of the sculpture of the first half and middle of the 20th century, a range of issues related to the concepts of “symbolic form”, “ideal” and “archetype” is analyzed. In the center of consideration is the image of the reclining figure in the works of Aristide Maillol and Henry Moore. Accepting the general statement that such sculptures embody the harmony of statics and dynamics, the author is keener to explore the historical patterns of the selection of a symbolic form in the category of a monument. The significance of the reclining figure is proved by separate historical examples related, in particular, to the work of Michelangelo, with classicism and its derivatives, the concept of the ideal form and the theory of architectonics. The theme of the ambiguity of the classical ideal, its fate in the 20th century, and its dependence on political / ideological ideas is also emphasized. In the sculptural concept of Maillol, the qualities of picturesque, corporeality, and monumentality stand out. In the description of Moore’s creativity, the reclining figure — “archetypal form” (term of Herbert Read) — is considered from the standpoint of identifying qualities in it that allowed the sculptor to realize it in a wide range of interpretations of form and content. Moore’s creativity issues include the relationship between sculpture and space, the interpretation of the statue’s silhouette, the revealing of the “landscape” and “pictorial” qualities in it, as well as the extensive theme of addressing classical heritage. The monumental characteristics of Moore’s reclining figures are analyzed; examples of their interpretation (including the artist himself) and critics are considered. The idea of a symbolic figure in the balance of a figurative and abstract form is adopted as an alternative to the monumental traditional, with emphasis on individual qualities.

Keywords:

Aristide Maillol, Henry Moore, form, archetype, figure, sculpture, art, monument

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biography

Alexander O. Kotlomanov, Sаint Petersburg Stieglitz State Academy of Art and Design

PhD, Associate Professor

References

References

1. Hildebrand, Adolf, von. Das Problem der Form in der bildenden Kunst. Strassburg: Heitz, 1893.

2. Wölfflin, Heinrich. “Adolf Hildebrands ‘Problem der Form’”. In Kleine Schriften: (1886–1933), Hrsg. von Joseph Gantner, 104–6. Basel: Schwabe, 1946.

3. Curtis, Penelope. Sculpture 1900–1945: After Rodin. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

4. Wipper, Boris. Introduction to the Historical Study of Art. Moscow: Izobrazitel’noye iskusstvo Publ., 1985. (In Russian)

5. Fry, Roger. “The Sculptures of Maillol”. Burlington Magazine 17, no. 85 (1910): 26–33.

6. Read, Herbert. A Concise History of Modern Sculpture. London: Thames & Hudson, 1964.

7. Read, Herbert. Icon and Idea: The Function of Art in the Development of Human Consciousness. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1955.

8. Read, Herbert. Henry Moore: A Study of His Life and Work. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1966.

9. Martin, Tim. “Erich Neumann on Henry Moore: Public Sculpture and the Collective Unconscious”. In Henry Moore: Sculptural Process and Public Identity. London: Tate Research Publication, 2015. Accessed March 08, 2019. https://www.tate.org.uk/art/research-publications/henry-moore/tim-martinerich-neumann-on-henry-moore-public-sculpture-and-the-collective-unconscious-r1151316.

10. Neumann, Erich. The Archetypal World of Henry Moore. New York: Pantheon Books, 1959.

11. Krauss, Rosalind E. Passages in Modern Sculpture. New York: The Viking Press, 1977.

12. Wilkinson, Alan, ed. Henry Moore: Writings and Conversations. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.

13. Sylvester, David. About Modern Art: Critical Essays, 1948–96. London: Chatto & Windus, 1996.

14. Russell, John. Henry Moore. London: Allen Lane; The Penguin Press, 1968.

15. Moor, Henry, words by, and John Hedgecoe, phot. and ed. Henry Spencer Moore. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1968.

16. Lucie-Smith, Edward. Sculpture Since 1945. London: Phaidon, 1987.

17. Causey, Andrew. Sculpture Since 1945. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

18. Hopkins, David. After Modern Art. 1945–2000. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

19. Seldis, Henry J. Henry Moore in America. London: Praeger, 1973.

20. Read, Herbert. The Art of Sculpture. London: Faber & Faber, 1956.

21. Martin, John Leslie, Ben Nicholson, and Naum Gabo, eds. Circle: International Survey of Contemporary Art. London: Faber and Faber, 1937.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-26

How to Cite

Kotlomanov, A. O. (2019). “Archetypal Forms” in Modern Sculpture. The Image of Reclining Figure: From Maillol to Moore, and so On. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts, 9(3), 558–576. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2019.307

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2019)

Section

Visual arts

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>